InAs single quantum dots in Wurtzite InP nanowires emitting at telecommunication wavelengths
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantum dots (QDs) embedded in semiconductors nanowires are of great interest for photonic quantum technologies. We have previously reported that QDs in nanowires could be an efficient source for single photons [1] and entangled photon pairs [2] that is required for applications in quantum computation, quantum cryptography and quantum optics. For these later applications, the source has to meet requirements such as high symmetry, high brightness, high extraction efficiency, high-fidelity entanglement and a precise position control at the nanoscale level. The selective area vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) growth process is a very suitable technique to synthesize nanowires with high yield and homogeneity [3]. Moreover, the optical and electronic properties of these QD based sources are controllable by manipulating the nanowire dimension, dot size, and composition. We have been so far very successful in producing high optical quality single InAsP quantum dots in InP nanowire that are emitting in the range of 890-970 nm. The emission wavelength is controlled by the arsenic percentage in the InAsP dot which is about 25%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".