MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2581031157

Correlations between the internal diffusion and equilibrium partition coefficients of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in building materials and the VOC properties

2001· article· en· W2581031157 on OpenAlexaffvenue
A. Bodalal, E. G. Plett, J. S. Zhang, C.Y. Shaw

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicConservation Techniques and Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPartition (number theory)Volatile organic compoundPartition coefficientDiffusionThermodynamicsChemistryEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceOrganic chemistryMathematicsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study. a novel experimental method that was previously developed was used to directly measure the internal diffusion (D) and the equilibrium partition coefficients (ke for three classes of volatile organic compound (VOC), (1) aliphatic hydrocarbons, (2) aromatic hydrocarbons, and (3) aliphatic aldehydes, through typical dry building materials (plywood, particleboard, vinyl floor tile, gypsum board, subfloor tile, and OSB). For each chemical class, correlationsbetween D and the VOC molecular weight and between ke and the vapor pressure of VOCs were developed for every product. These correlations can be used to estimate D and ke whendirect measurement data are not available and, thus, facilitate the prediction of VOC emissions from the building materials using mass transfer theory. It was found that the values of diffusioncoefficients for a given material are inversely proportional to the molecular weights of the VOCs, and the values of the partition coefficients are also inversely proportional to the vapor pressures of the VOCs. The measured diffusion and partition coefficients are useful for predicting the emission rates of VOCs from building materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicConservation Techniques and StudiesFrench-language works237,207