A Research on the Belt and Road Initiatives and Strategies of RMB Internationalization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some problems exist in current international monetary system, such as dollar dominance and frequent fluctuation of exchange rate, which are not conducive to the development of trade, investment and global economy. Financial crises break out frequently. So we should reform the international monetary system and create a multi-polar international monetary system to regulate dollar conduct by mutual competitions. RMB internationalization is not only favorable to the stability of the world's currency, but also good to China's own development. The Belt and Road Initiative has been bringing more opportunities for the internationalization of the RMB. The Belt and Road Initiative aims to strengthen economic cooperation between China and its neighboring countries and promotes the regional economic prosperity. This strategy provides a good opportunity for China to develop trade, increase investment and expand financial markets. So RMB should take advantage of this opportunity to improve the proportion of RMB trade settlement, increase the amount of RMB investment and financing and accelerate the circulation of RMB, and then steadily push forward the process of RMB internationalization under the premise of controlling risks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it