Контракты жизненного цикла в сфере закупок товаров, работ, услуг для обеспечения государственных и муниципальных нужд
Bibliographic record
Abstract
01.01.2014, the procurement budget funds are made in accordance with the Federal Law № 44 -FZ On the contract system in the procurement of goods. Works and services for state and municipal needs. This law for the first time in the Russian Federation defines the contract life cycle as a contract involving the purchase of goods or construction, subsequent maintenance, operation over the lifetime, repair, disposal of the goods delivered or created as a result of work object (p.16 item 34 ). This paper presents an international experience of using life cycle contracts and direction of development in the Russian Federation. Also represented the most significant contracts lifecycle countries such as Great Britain, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, Portugal, the United States and Finland. Author discussed in detail the experience of the application of the contract life cycle as an example of construction of high-speed railways in the UK and the Netherlands. The main aspects of the organization life cycle contracts in terms of public-private partnership.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".