Multiple receiver wireless power charger for mobile electronic devices in near field
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, wireless power transfer technology has come to limelight because of its possibility of providing viable solutions to the challenges encountered by electronic device consumers when using traditional methods of charging batteries. This paper presents a multiple receiver wireless power transfer system for charging mobile phone batteries. The circuit consists of a transmitter and two receiver systems. A mathematical analysis of the circuit is carried out and simulated to understand its behavior with variation in coupling coefficient and load. In order to charge mobile phones without an extra communication module over a wide range of coupling coefficients, a variable frequency control algorithm is used. The transmitter circuit uses the algorithm to track the maximum input power of the system. The output voltage of the receiver circuit is controlled to meet the power requirement of the load as coupling coefficient varies by using a switch capacitor modeled as two back to back connected MOSFETs with their drain-to-source capacitance. The proposed converter circuit topology is simulated and the results are presented. The circuit operates over a wide range of coupling coefficient and the power requirement of the mobile phones are met without using an extra communication module. The resonance frequency of the circuit is 5.7MHZ and it is design to deliver 10W (5V, 2A) each to two mobile phones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it