Efficacy of Mycobacterium Phlei Cell Wall-Nucleic Acid Complex (MCNA) in BCG-Unresponsive Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: We have previously reported the results of a prospective multi-institutional study on the efficacy of MCNA in patients who recurred after intravesical BCG treatment [ 1 ]. Since that publication, a new standardized definition for BCG-unresponsiveness has been established [ 2 ]. Objective: We re-analyzed the oncologic outcomes following intravesical MCNA in patients classified as BCG-unresponsive according to the new definition. Methods: For this analysis, we focused on the enrolled patients who satisfied the requirements for BCG Unresponsiveness: i.e. adequate BCG treatment (at least 5/6 induction and 2/3 maintenance instillations) and high grade tumor within 6 months of prior BCG. Treatment course included 6 weekly intravesical instillations of 8 mg MCNA followed by 3 weekly instillations at months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24. Followup assessments included cystoscopy, urine cytology and biopsy. Patients absent of high grade disease confirmed by central review of biopsy were deemed disease-free. Results: Of the 129 patients enrolled, 94 (68 CIS with/without papillary tumors, 26 papillary only tumors) fit the criteria for the new BCG Unresponsive definition. Overall, disease free survival (DFS) for all BCG unresponsive patients was 48.9% (95% CI 38.0–59.0%) at 6 months, 34.8% (95% CI 24.7–45%) at 1 year and 28.3% (15.7–34.3%) at 2 years post induction. In the group with papillary tumors, DFS measured at months 6, 12, and 24 were: 61.2% (38.2–77.8%), 61.2(38.2–77.8%), and 50.1% (27.5–69%). In the CIS-containing group, the corresponding DFS were: 44.8% (32.3–56.4%), 26.5% (16.3–37.9%), and 16.6% (8.6–26.9%), respectively. Conclusions: For patients who are BCG Unresponsive, MCNA has the potential to render 26.5% of patients with CIS and 61.2% of patients with papillary tumors disease-free for at least 1 year with an intact bladder. The higher efficacy noted in the true BCG-unresponsive cohort than was previously reported with all-comers emphasizes the importance of having clearly defined criteria for clinical trials investigating new intravesical therapies after BCG failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".