MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2581295120 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0923

Multi‐group particle swarm optimisation for transmission expansion planning solution based on LU decomposition

2017· article· en· W2581295120 on OpenAlexafffund
Shengjun Huang, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationDecompositionGroup (periodic table)Mathematical optimizationTransmission (telecommunications)Computer scienceDecomposition method (queueing theory)MathematicsPhysicsChemistryTelecommunicationsStatisticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As power systems are being highly stressed with the boost of loading levels and the introduction of new generation sources, transmission expansion planning (TEP) has regained its significance as a pivotal problem to be solved. To ameliorate the performance on both efficiency and accuracy for the solution of TEP from the aspect of algorithm design, a static DC TEP without generation redispatch is investigated by the proposed multi‐group particle swarm optimisation (MGPSO) algorithm. MGPSO is based on the discrete PSO framework with several beneficial enhancements involved, such as Sobol sequence initialisation method, multi‐group co‐evolution strategy, and mutation mechanism. For the solution of linear programming subproblem within the framework of MGPSO, a linear equation system is extracted and then addressed with efficient LU decomposition approach. Case studies have been implemented on five classical benchmarks, ranging from 6‐bus to 118‐bus, between the MGPSO and commercial software Lingo 11.0 to validate the superiority of MGPSO. Speedup analysis as well as performance evaluation of different acceleration strategy involved in MGPSO are implemented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Generation Transmission & DistributionSame topicElectric Power System OptimizationFrench-language works237,207