MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2581332145 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2017.2658956

Outage Performance of Exponentiated Weibull FSO Links Under Generalized Pointing Errors

2017· article· en· W2581332145 on OpenAlexafffund
Rubén Boluda-Ruiz, Antonio García-Zambrana, Carmen Castillo-Vázquez, Beatriz Castillo-Vázquez, Steve Hranilovic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersJunta de AndalucíaConsejería de Economía, Innovación, Ciencia y Empleo, Junta de AndalucíaMcMaster UniversityUniversidad de Málaga
KeywordsScintillationTransmitterFadingWeibull distributionExponentiated Weibull distributionTurbulenceBit error rateAperture (computer memory)Channel (broadcasting)Beam (structure)Free-space optical communicationPhysicsOpticsMathematicsOptical communicationElectronic engineeringComputer scienceStatisticsTelecommunicationsAcousticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Even in clear conditions, free-space optical (FSO) links are impaired by scintillation and dynamic misalignment which result in a slow fading channel. This paper presents the first characterization of outage performance for single-input/single-output FSO links over exponentiated Weibull atmospheric turbulence and generalized misalignment. A novel feature of this paper is that a generalized pointing error model is employed which not only takes into account the impact of different jitters for the elevation and the horizontal displacement but also the effect of different boresight errors for each axis. The developed asymptotic expressions are used to find optimum beam widths that minimize the impact of pointing error effects in a variety of atmospheric turbulence conditions. Obtained results corroborate that the impact of generalized pointing errors is approximately the same over moderate and strong turbulence conditions when an aperture-averaged receiver is considered. Additionally, the use of a transmitter with optimized beam width can result in large gains on the order of 5 dB or even greater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207