KEBIJAKAN PENGELOLAAN RUANG DAN KEBERLANJUTAN KAWASAN KARST MAROS PANGKEP PROVINSI SULAWESI SELATAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kawasan Karst Maros Pangkep dikenal dengan KKMP adalah ekosistem karst yang unik di Sulawesi Selatan. Bagian dari pegunungan Bulusaraung di Utara Maros dan bagian selatan Pangkep. 40.000 ha dari kawasan karstkaya akan flora dan fauna, yang bernilai ilmiah, sosial, budaya dan ekonomi. Kawasan tersebut berada dibawah tekanan dari persaingan penggunaan kegiatan ekonomi, seperti pertambangan untuk industri semen dan marmer. Tulisan ini mencoba untuk menilai kebijakan pengelolaan yang berkelanjutan bagi kawasan dengan menggunakan analisi multi kriteria OnBalance. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan Business as Usual dalam pengelolaan Kawasan Karst Maraos Pangkep tidak akan berkelanjutan dari dimensi Lingkungan, ataupun dimensi ekonomi, dan dimensi sosial budaya. Studi ini menawarkan pengelolaan KKMP dengan pendekatan konservasi dan ekowisata berbasis masyarakat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".