IDO-expressing Fibroblasts Suppress the Development of Imiquimod-induced Psoriasis-like Dermatitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Psoriasis is a chronic skin condition whose pathogenesis is reported to be due to the activation of the interleukin-23/interleukin-17 (IL-23/IL-17) pathway. Here, we report that indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO)-expressing fibroblasts reduce the activity of this pathway in activated immune cells. The findings showed that intralesional injection of IDO-expressing fibroblasts in imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like dermatitis on the back and ear (Pso. ear group) in mice significantly improves the clinical lesional appearance by reducing the number of skin-infiltrated IL-17+ CD4+ T cells (1.9% ± 0.3% vs. 6.9% ± 0.6%, n = 3, P value < 0.01), IL-17+ γδ+ T cells (2.8% ± 0.3% vs. 11.6% ± 1.2%, n = 3, P value < 0.01), IL-23+ activated dendritic cells (7.6% ± 0.9% vs. 14.0% ± 0.5%, n = 3, P < 0.01), macrophages (4.3% ± 0.1% vs. 11.3% ± 1.0%, n = 3, P value < 0.01), and granulocytes (2.5% ± 0.4% vs. 4.5% ± 0.3%, n = 3, P value < 0.01) as compared to untreated psoriatic mice. This finding suggests that IDO-expressing fibroblasts, and to a lesser extent, non-IDO primary fibroblasts suppress the psoriatic-like symptoms by inhibiting the infiltration of key immune cells involved in the development of psoriasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".