MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2581585125 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2016-0331

Integrative design of left-turn lane space and signal coordination for two adjacent intersections

2017· article· en· W2581585125 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ronghan Yao, Weiwei Guo, Hongmei Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsOffset (computer science)Intersection (aeronautics)SIGNAL (programming language)Constraint (computer-aided design)Computer scienceSignal timingTurn (biochemistry)Space (punctuation)Traffic signalControl theory (sociology)Traffic simulationRange (aeronautics)SimulationTraffic engineeringAlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematicsReal-time computingEngineeringTransport engineeringGeometryAerospace engineeringArtificial intelligencePhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For two adjacent signalized intersections with short left-turn lanes, the capacity and delay for each intersection depend on not only the left-turn lane space but also the signal coordination strategy. In this paper, two optimization models are formulated to integrate the design of the left-turn lane space and signal coordination. While model II can simultaneously optimize the short-lane space, green splits, and offset under the equal-cycle constraint, model I could not simultaneously obtain them. The simulation-based algorithm is proposed to seek the best offset in the global range when the common cycle length, green splits and short-lane length are all ascertained together with signal phase plan. Numerical examples are given to demonstrate these two models. The findings reveal that model II is more effective and easier to apply than model I. Finally, the application of model II in engineering practice is also given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207