A compact CPW‐fed antenna with fractal S‐shaped patches for multiband applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT We present the design of a novel compact coplanar waveguide‐fed antenna with fractal s‐shaped patches for multiband applications. The antenna consists of three fractal s‐shaped patches with different lengths. We demonstrate that the number of resonant frequencies is in direct proportion with the number of fractal s‐shaped patches. This is to say that, the number of resonant frequencies in a multiband antenna can be increased by increasing the number of patches. The resonant frequencies can be selected by carefully adjusting the length of the patches. We have designed our antenna to operate at 2.5/5.3/7.1/8.4 GHz. The measurement results show that the proposed antenna has 10 dB impedance bandwidths of 622 MHz (2.322–2.944 GHz), 466 MHz (5.113–5.579 GHz), 121 MHz (6.890–7.011 GHz) and 1080 MHz (8.206–9.286 GHz) to cover all the 2.4 GHz Bluetooth, 5.5 GHz WiMAX, and 2.4/5.2 GHz WLAN bands. The latter two bands of our proposed antenna fall within the X band range which finds vast applications in radar, aircraft, spacecraft and mobile or satellite communication system. The proposed antenna is printed on a single‐layered FR4 substrate, and it occupies a small volume of 17 × 18 × 1.6 mm 3 . The simulated and measured performance of the antenna confirms its omnidirectional radiation pattern and quad‐band operation. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 59:541–546, 2017
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it