MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2581666783 · doi:10.20381/ruor-691

Modelling Human Risk of West Nile Virus Using Surveillance and Environmental Data

2017· article· en· W2581666783 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shruti Mallya

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWest Nile virusGeographyEnvironmental healthRisk analysis (engineering)VirologyBusinessVirusBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Limited research has been performed in Ontario to ascertain risk factors for West Nile Virus (WNV) and to develop a unified risk prediction strategy. The aim of the current body of work was to use spatio-temporal modelling in conjunction with surveillance and environmental data to determine which pre-WNV season factors could forecast a high risk season and to explore how well mosquito surveillance data could predict human cases in space and time during the WNV season. Generalized linear mixed modelling found that mean minimum monthly temperature variables and annual WNV-positive mosquito pools were most significantly predictive of number of human WNV cases (p<0.001). Spatio-temporal cluster analysis found that positive mosquito pool clusters could predict human case clusters up to one month in advance. These results demonstrate the usefulness of mosquito surveillance data as well as publicly available climate data for assessing risk and informing public health practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Same topicData-Driven Disease SurveillanceFrench-language works237,207