MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2581696923

The ICTs, climate change adaptation and water project value chain

2012· article· en· W2581696923 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Richard Heeks, Angelica V. Ospina, Edith Adera, Alison L. Finlay

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAssociation for Progressive CommunicationsInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsAdaptation (eye)ICTSClimate changeValue (mathematics)Climate change adaptationValue chainInformation and Communications TechnologyBusinessEnvironmental resource managementSupply chainComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceMarketingPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water resources are one of the cornerstones of socioeconomic development, and as such, they are central to understanding climate change impacts on vulnerable populations.Emerging research at the intersection of climate change, information and communication technologies (ICTs) and development indicates the existence of increasing linkages between use of ICT tools and developing country efforts to mitigate, adapt, monitor and strategise in the face of climate change.Critical resources such as water are at the forefront of developing countries' adaptation agendas.This paper maps conceptually the linkages between climate change adaptation, water and ICTs, drawing on various approaches from the development, ICTs, and climate change fields 1 .It presents a conceptual tool that can be used by ICT and climate change practitioners and researchers seeking to analyse and plan field interventions in contexts facing water stress due to short and longterm climate change.The 'ICTs, Climate Change Adaptation and Water Project Value Chain' maps a processfocused approach for integration of ICT tools into the design, operation and evaluation of projects in the field of climate change adaptation and water resources.It will be argued that, while ICTs have the potential to enable adaptive capacities and actions for water resources under climatic stress, their role needs to be integrated into ongoing and future initiatives from a holistic perspective one that considers the complete 'project value chain'.Ultimately, projects in the field should ensure not only the availability, affordability and accessibility of ICT tools (all aspects of "digital capital"), but also their actual uptake and use if adaptation goals and ultimately, development outcomes, are to be achieved.The analysis will suggest that integrating this 'hybrid' processfocused approach into the design, operation and evaluation of wateradaptation projects, could help build the adaptive capacity of vulnerable communities to climateinduced shocks and chronic trends.This document was prepared building on the findings of three regional reports commissioned by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and the Association for Progressive Communications (APC) on ICTs, Climate Change and Water from

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester)Same topicICT Impact and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207