MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2581790236 · doi:10.1115/1.4035740

An Embedded System for a High-Speed Manipulator With Single Time Scale Visual Servoing

2017· article· en· W2581790236 on OpenAlexafffund
Migara H. Liyanage, Nicholas Krouglicof

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward IslandMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayVisual servoingComputer scienceComputer hardwareNios IISoftwareEmbedded systemController (irrigation)Interface (matter)SIGNAL (programming language)Real-time computingRobotParallel computingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents the development of an embedded system for controlling a high-speed robotic manipulator. Three different types of controllers including hardware proportional derivative (PD), software PD, and single time scale visual servoing are considered in this study. Novel field programmable gate array (FPGA) technology was used for implementing the embedded system for faster execution speeds and parallelism. It is comprised of dedicated hardware and software modules for obtaining sensor feedback and control signal (CT) estimation, providing the control signal to the servovalves. A NIOS II virtual soft processor system was configured in the FPGA for implementing functions that are computationally expensive and difficult to implement in hardware. Quadrature decoding, serial peripheral interface (SPI) input and output modules, and control signal estimation in some cases was carried out using the dedicated hardware modules. The experiments show that the proposed controller performed satisfactory control of the end effector position. It performed single time scale visual servoing with control signal updates at 330 Hz to control the end effector trajectory at speeds of up to 0.8 ms−1. The FPGA technology also provided a more compact single chip implementation of the controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and ControlSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207