Novel insights into the molecular heterogeneity of hepatocellular carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is influenced by numerous factors, which results in diverse genetic, epigenetic and transcriptional scenarios, thus posing obvious challenges for disease management. We scrutinized the molecular heterogeneity of HCC with a multi-omics approach in two small cohorts of resected and explanted livers. Whole-genome transcriptomics was conducted, including polyadenylated transcripts and micro (mi)-RNAs. Copy number variants (CNV) were inferred from whole genome low-pass sequencing data. Fifty-six cancer-related genes were screened using an oncology panel assay. HCC was associated with a dramatic transcriptional deregulation of hundreds of protein-coding genes suggesting downregulation of drugs catabolism, induction of inflammatory responses, and increased cell proliferation in resected livers. Moreover, several long non-coding RNAs and miRNAs not reported previously in the context of HCC were found deregulated. In explanted livers, downregulation of genes involved in energy-producing processes and upregulation of genes aiding in glycolysis were detected. Numerous CNV events were observed, with conspicuous hotspots on chromosomes 1 and 17. Amplifications were more common than deletions, and spanned regions containing genes potentially involved in tumorigenesis. CSF1R, FGFR3, FLT3, NPM1, PDGFRA, PTEN, SMO and TP53 were mutated in all tumors, while other 26 cancer-related genes were mutated with variable penetrance. Our results highlight a remarkable molecular heterogeneity between HCC tumors and reinforce the notion that precision medicine approaches are urgently needed for cancer treatment. We expect that our results will serve as a valuable dataset that will generate hypotheses for us or other researchers to evaluate to ultimately improve our understanding of HCC biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".