MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

CD20 B Cell Depleting Therapy Is Associated with up-Regulation of CD8+CD25highFoxp3+ T Regulatory Cells in a Murine Model of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

2014· article· en· W2581872566 on OpenAlexaff
Li Guo, Rukhsana Aslam, Yajing Zhao, Edwin R. Speck, Heyu Ni, John W. Semple

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD8ImmunologyCD19B cellT cellImmune systemCytotoxic T cellCD20RituximabBiologyAntibodyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by increased platelet destruction and/or impaired megakaryocyte production, mediated by autoreactive B cells and T cells. B cell depletion therapy by rituximab, a monoclonal human anti-CD20 antibody, has been shown effective in both anti-platelet antibody positive (B cell mediated) and negative (T cell mediated) ITP patients. Those patients responsive to rituximab therapy showed normalized CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses (Stasi et al. Blood. 2007), however, the mechanism of T cell regulation by B cell depletion is not clear. One possibility is through normalization of CD4+ T helper cells or up-regulation of CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) (Stasi et al. Blood. 2008). Another possibility is by suppression of activated conventional CD8+ T cells or the up-regulation of CD8+ Tregs. We examined the changes of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and Tregs (CD25highFoxp3+) after B cell depletion in vivo in our ITP mouse model. Briefly, BALB/c GPIIIa (CD61) KO mice were either given PBS (ND) or mouse monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody (B-dep, Biogen) at day -1 and day 13 (250ug/mouse, ip). Residual CD19+ B cells in peripheral blood were less than 0.1% within 24hours in the latter group. All mice were immunized by transfusions of wildtype (WT) platelets at day 0, 7, 14, and 21 (1×108/mouse, iv). At day 28, we examined the percentages of T cell subsets in the spleens of the immunized mice. B cell-depleted immune CD61 KO mice showed significantly higher percentages of both CD3+CD8+ T cells and CD8+CD25highFoxp3+ T cells (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the CD3+CD4+ and CD4+CD25highFoxp3+ T cell populations. Both ND and B-dep immune CD61 KO splenocytes showed increased cytotoxicity activity against CD61+ PU5-1.8 target cells in vitro compared with naïve CD61 KO splenocytes, indicating the activation of CD8+ T cells. To test their in vivo effect on ITP development, splenocytes were engrafted from immune mice into irradiated and AsialoGM-1 treated severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice at a dose of 2.5×104/mouse and the mice were monitored for weekly platelet counts. ND and in vitro B cell depleted splenocytes from immune KO mice induced persistent ITP during 3 weeks observation whereas splenocytes from B-dep immune mice did not. To further confirm the role of B cell depletion on CD8+ T cell responses, CD8+ T cells from either ND or B-dep immune CD61 KO splenocytes were purified and transferred into SCID mice at 3×104/mouse. CD4+ T cells from ND immune CD61 KO splenocytes were added at 3×104/mouse to all the SCID mice to support the CD8+ T cell survival in vivo. SCID mice received CD8+ T cells from B-dep group showed higher platelet count at Day 14. Overall, our results indicate a protective role of CD8+CD25highFoxp3+ T cells against the development of cell mediated ITP that is enhanced by B cell depleting therapy in vivo. Table 1. CD61 KO MouseSpleens CD3+CD8+(%) CD8+CD25highFoxp3+ (%) Naïve Control 9.12±0.37 0.12±0.08 Immune, ND 6.78±2.37 0.0925±0.03 Immune, B-dep 14.15±5.1 0.2367±0.11 P value (ND vs B-dep) 0.0007 0.0064 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→