MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2581896750 · doi:10.5539/mas.v11n4p30

Assessment of Nitrogen Leaching of Cropping Pattern by Soil Nitrogen Balance Equation (Case Study: Varamin Irrigation and Drainage Network)

2017· article· en· W2581896750 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maryam Yousefi, Jaber Soltani, Ali RahimiKhob, Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib, Elyas Soltani

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrogenEnvironmental scienceLeaching (pedology)AgronomyIrrigationNitrogen deficiencyNitrogen balanceFertilizerSoil waterSoil scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrogen is often one of the most important limiting factors for biomass production. Usually few soils have proper amount of nitrogen, so it is usually added by fertilizers. In cropping systems, nitrogen fertilization practices can provide a sufficient nitrogen supply for plants to achieve the potential yield. However, to ensure reaching to this potential yield, farmers often apply more nitrogen fertilizers than the required nitrogen for achieving maximum yield. Nitrogen fertilizer should be given to soil according to nitrogen content of soil, water and crop nitrogen demand during the growth periods. Especially in the lands that apply wastewater and groundwater for irrigation and irrigation sources have large quantities of nitrogen, therefore we Should reduce the amount of fertilizer used in agricultural lands, In other words for planning the plant fertilizer demand, nitrogen balance in soil should be considered. Nitrogen overuse increases the risk of nitrogen leaching to groundwater, contaminating groundwater and threatening the human health. In recent years, critical plant nitrogen concentration equation is used to determine crop nitrogen demand during the different growth stages of plants. The purpose of this study is to determine the nitrogen demand of Varamin network’s cropping pattern by using the critical plant nitrogen concentration equation and comparing the result with the amount of nitrogen fertilizer commonly applied in the study area. In this study, monthly biomass production for growing period was determined based on normalized water productivity index and plant canopy development. Coefficient of critical nitrogen concentration equation for each plant was determined by previous researches. The result of this study showed that for barley, the amount of nitrogen applied in Varamin network is equal to nitrogen demand of the cropsand for wheat, maize and tomato are 25%, 61% and 18%, respectively, higher than the amount obtained from critical plant nitrogen concentration equation.also according to the results of soil Nitrogen balance in lands covered by AU canal of Varamin network, 707 ton of nitrogen entered to soil and groundwater by leaching and we should considered appropriate solutions to reduce leaching, such as using high-yielding crops that remove a significant amount of N in the harvested portion, synchronizing fertilizer application with crop demand, conjunctive use of wastewater and groundwater with proper nitrogen concentration and etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicWater-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesFrench-language works237,207