The female abdomen and genitalia of Syrphidae (Diptera)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The female abdomen of Syrphidae was studied based on a sample from all currently recognized tribes, except Spheginobacchini. All characters found were compared with previous literature on Syrphidae female abdomen and some were proposed as diagnostic for the taxa. The condition of the postabdomen distinguishes Pipizinae from the Syrphinae. Presence of sclerotized areas on the intersegmental membrane appears characteristic of the Rhingiini. Tergite and sternite 6 had unique characteristics only found in Cerioidini, and sternite 8 had a condition only found in Cerioidini and Callicerini. Notiocheilosia (Callicerini) seems more similar to Nausigaster (Eumerini). Characters present in both the Eristalini and Sericomyiini are presented. The condition of the epiproct, and of its apodemes, proved diagnostic for Microdontini, Volucellini and some Syrphini plus the Paragini. Bacchini sensu lato and Toxomerini were also distinct. The Milesiini still need to be sampled more broadly to ascertain about its relationships with other tribes and within.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it