La persévérance scolaire : Le point de vue d’adultes inscrits en formation de base commune
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans un contexte où toujours plus d’adultes poursuivent leurs études en Formation de base commune, plusieurs vivent des défis de persévérance scolaire. Notre recherche descriptive-interprétative avait donc pour objectif de recueillir et d’analyser les points de vue et les expériences d’adultes inscrits en formation de base commune afin de mieux comprendre les dimensions intrapersonnelles, interpersonnelles et institutionnelles qui entrent en jeu dans la capacité de ces adultes à persévérer. Notre article dresse alors un portrait de soixante-cinq adultes en formation. Leurs parcours scolaires passés et présents, leurs situations de vie actuelles et leurs projets d'avenir montrent la valeur accordée aux études et leur volonté de réussir en s’appuyant sur leurs ressources personnelles et les ressources pédagogiques mises à leur disposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".