1599-1629 : le roman français du premier xviie siècle et la mémoire des guerres de Religion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alors qu’on associe le souvenir des guerres de Religion dans la fiction française au genre des nouvelles historiques et galantes des années 1660, cet article montre comment le roman (sentimental, chevaleresque et d’aventures) du début du xviie siècle a été un premier lieu de mémoire de ces guerres civiles. Les diverses modalités de fictionnalisation de l’histoire ainsi que le traitement romanesque de la violence sont exposés, dans le souci de dégager la spécificité de l’approche romanesque de la guerre civile. Finalement, c’est le travail de mémoire singulier de chaque sous-genre romanesque que met en lumière cette recherche : souvenir partageable, mémoire militante des troubles ou lecture critique du passé pour mieux agir au présent. Les romans écrits entre 1599 et 1629 proposent ainsi une palette intéressante de romans « historiques », bien avant que ce genre de fiction n’apparaisse sous le règne de Louis xiv.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".