MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Directional Local Density of States of Classical and Quantum Propagating Surface Plasmons

2017· article· en· W2582106147 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Martin Berthel, Quanbo Jiang, Aline Pham, J. Bellessa, Cyriaque Genet, S. Huant, Aurélien Drezet

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Applied · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceAgence Nationale de la RechercheEquipex
KeywordsPhysicsPlasmonSurface plasmonQuantumCoupling (piping)Local density of statesQuantum opticsQuantum imagingOptoelectronicsOpticsQuantum mechanicsQuantum technologyOpen quantum systemMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface plasmons (SPs) are key excitations for manipulating light in two dimensions, as in integrated optical circuits on chips. Here the authors show how to filter, in selected directions, the signal due to SP motion in a collimating device. Considering both the classical and quantum optical regimes, they interpret their findings in terms of a propagative electromagnetic local density of states. This approach could also be used in other quantum-technology contexts, $e.g.$ to optimize the coupling efficiency of quantum emitters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review AppliedSame topicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchFrench-language works237,207