MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2582109592 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v9n1p143

Domain Decomposition Modified with Characteristic Mixed Finite Element and Numerical Analysis for Three-Dimensional Slightly Compressible Oil-Water Seepage Displacement

2017· article· en· W2582109592 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yirang Yuan, Luo Chang, Changfeng Li, Tongjun Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDomain decomposition methodsMathematicsFinite element methodNumerical analysisNorm (philosophy)Mathematical analysisMixed finite element methodApplied mathematicsBoundary value problem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A parallel algorithm is presented to solve three-dimensional slightly compressible seepage displacement where domain decomposition and characteristics-mixed finite element are combined. Decomposing the computational domain into several subdomains, we define a special function to approximate the derivative at interior boundary explicitly and obtain numerical solutions of the saturation implicitly on subdomains in parallel. The method of characteristics can confirm strong stability at the fronts, and can avoid numerical dispersion and nonphysical oscillation. It can adopt large-time step but can obtain small time truncation error. So a characteristic domain decomposition finite element scheme is put forward to compute the saturation. The flow equation is computed by the method of mixed finite element and numerical accuracy of Darcy velocity is improved one order. For a model problem we apply some techniques such as variation form, domain decomposition, the method of characteristics, the principle of energy, negative norm estimates, induction hypothesis, and the theory of priori estimates of differential equations to derive optimal error estimate in $l^2$ norm. Numerical example is given to testify theoretical analysis and numerical data show that this method is effective in solving actual applications. Then it can solve the well-known problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207