MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2582136288 · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx010

The ALMA view of W33A: a spiral filament feeding the candidate disc in MM1-Main

2017· article· en· W2582136288 on OpenAlexfundno aff
L. T. Maud, M. G. Hoare, Roberto Galván-Madrid, Qizhou Zhang, W. J. de Wit, Eric Keto, K. Johnston, J. E. Pineda

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEuropean Research CouncilAlberta Livestock and Meat Agency
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsMillimeterProtein filamentSubmillimeter ArraySpiral galaxyRotation (mathematics)CentroidLine (geometry)AstronomyStar formationGalaxyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We targeted the massive star-forming region W33A using the Atacama large sub/millimeter array in bands 6 (230 GHz) and 7 (345 GHz) to search for a sub-1000 au disc around the central O-type massive young stellar object W33A MM1-Main. Our data achieve a resolution of ∼0.2 arcsec (∼500 au) and resolve the central core, MM1, into multiple components and reveal complex and filamentary structures. There is strong molecular line emission covering the entire MM1 region. The kinematic signatures are inconsistent with only Keplerian rotation although we propose that the shift in the emission line centroids within ∼1000 au of MM1-Main could hint at an underlying compact disc with Keplerian rotation. We cannot however rule out the possibility of an unresolved binary or multiple system. A putative smaller disc could be fed by the large-scale spiral ‘feeding filament’ we detect in both gas and dust emission. We also discuss the nature of the now-resolved continuum sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society LettersSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207