MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2582204415 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2017.9

Patient K.C.: neuropathology of a unique case of memory impairment

2017· article· fr· W2582204415 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Andrew Gao, R. Shayna Rosenbaum, Fuqiang Gao, Morris Moscovitch, Endel Tulving, Sandra E. Black, Julia Keith

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropathologyContent (measure theory)Action (physics)MedicinePsychologyNeuroscienceComputer sciencePathologyMathematicsPhysicsDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autopsy, however, disclosed a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the cerebellum with widespread dissemination throughout the brain.In the background were multifocal gliotic regions of myelin/axonal loss with intermixed infiltrates of T-cells and microglia/macrophages.The biopsy sites and resection cavity showed similar findings.Overlapping features between these chronic lesions and that in the surgical specimens suggest a shared pathogenesis, supporting a concept that the sentinel lesion represents a reaction to an emerging PCNSL, either immune mediated or resorptive due to spontaneous or induced regression.Moreover, as demonstrated, PCNSL should remain a persistent consideration in the differential diagnosis, even though clinical, imaging, and pathology indices may fail in resolution between tumefactive MS, sentinel lesion, or overt PCNSL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicNeurology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207