MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2582517960 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.015805

Decay branching ratios of excited<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2017· article· lv· W2582517960 on OpenAlexaff
J. Munson, E. B. Norman, J. T. Burke, R. J. Casperson, L. Phair, E. McCleskey, M. McCleskey, D. Lee, R. O. Hughes, S. Ota, A. Czeszumska, Perry Chodash, A. Saastamoinen, R. A. E. Austin, A. Spiridon, M. Dağ, R. Chyzh, M. S. Basunia, J. J. Ressler, Thomas J. Ross

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2017
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
FundersNuclear PhysicsLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryNational Nuclear Security AdministrationLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsEnergy (signal processing)Coulomb barrierNuclear reactionBranching fractionCoulombNuclear physicsElectronQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nuclear reactions $^{12}\mathrm{C}(^{12}\mathrm{C},\ensuremath{\alpha})^{20}\mathrm{Ne}$, $^{12}\mathrm{C}(^{12}\mathrm{C},p)^{23}\mathrm{Na}$, and $^{12}\mathrm{C}(^{12}\mathrm{C},n)^{23}\mathrm{Mg}$ are the primary reactions in carbon burning, which occurs as part of several stellar processes. The Gamow window, which describes the energy range where most of these reactions take place, is typically around 1.5 MeV in the center-of-mass frame. Direct measurements of the cross sections at this energy are difficult due to the large Coulomb barrier present between the carbon nuclei; however, a successful surrogate measurement can provide the branching ratios between these reactions while avoiding the $^{12}\mathrm{C}+\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}^{12}\mathrm{C}$ Coulomb barrier. An experiment was performed using inelastic scattering of 40 MeV $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ particles on $^{24}\mathrm{Mg}$ as a possible surrogate for the $^{12}\mathrm{C}+\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}^{12}\mathrm{C}$ compound nucleus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207