MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Liver resection for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma.

2012· article· en· W2582574187 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Tae Wan Kim, Ji-Hyun Jang, Sandra E. Fischer, Paul D. Greig, Steven Gallinger, Alice C. Wei, Ian M McGilivray, Mark S. Cattral, Sean P. Cleary

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHepatocellular carcinomaCirrhosisLiver cancerGastroenterologyStage (stratigraphy)HepatectomyInternal medicineLiver diseaseEtiologyHepatitis CCancerSurgeryResection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

355 Background: Liver resection for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. This study was conducted to outline our institution’s experience with liver resection for multifocal HCC. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent liver resections from 1992 to 2011 for histologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma was performed. Multifocal disease was defined as more than 1 histologically proven HCC found in the liver resection specimens. Results: Of the 386 liver resections performed for HCC, 47 were performed for multifocal disease. Mean age was 60+11 years, and most patients (92%) had chronic liver disease. Hepatitis B was the most common etiology (60%), followed by hepatitis C (26%), and other etiologies (15%). Most patients were Child’s class A (89%). Most patients had intermediate Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage (stage B) tumors (81%) and a minority of patients had early stage tumors (BCLC stage A, 19%). Major hepatectomy (>2 segments) was performed in 87% with an in hospital mortality of 6.4%. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo scale >3) occurred in 4 patients (9%). Median length of stay was 7 days and the rate of liver failure was 4.3%. Mean tumor number was 3+2 and the size of the largest lesion was 5+3 cm. Cirrhosis was present in 51% of patients. Majority of tumors were moderately differentiated (60%) and vascular invasion was present in 42%. The recurrence rate was 57% and the liver was the most common site of recurrence (81%). Treatment of recurrences occurred in 74% of patients: ablation (33%), chemotherapy (11%), transarterial chemoembolization (11%), resection (7.4%), sorafenib/radiation (7.4%) and transplantation (3.7%). Median disease free interval was 8 months and the overall survival was 18 months Conclusions: Liver resection for multifocal HCC can be performed safely in patients with chronic liver disease. Long term survival can be achieved in these patients and it should be considered as an option.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.332
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis→French-language works237,207→