MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W25826042 · doi:10.25419/rcsi.10815695

Proficiency-based simulation training in open and endovascular surgery.

2012· article· en· W25826042 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hazem Hseino

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)Simulation trainingOpen surgeryMedicineComputer scienceSurgerySimulationGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The traditional form of surgical skills training and recent changes in health care have created challenges in keeping up the standards in skills training of future surgeons. The structured development of simulation training might help tackle these challenges. The main aim of this thesis was to explore whether basic surgical skills acquired using proficiency-based simulation training in superficial femoral artery (SFA) angioplasty and saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) dissection translate to real-world performance. Four studies were performed. In the first study, a procedure-specific checklist for SFA angioplasty was developed and validated using the Vascular Intervention Simulation Trainer (VIST) simulator. In the second study, the impact of an assistant on the technical skills of the primary operator performing SFA angioplasties on the VIST simulator was assessed. The first and the second studies were essential to study the transfer of endovascular skills after proficiency-based simulation training in SFA angioplasty to the interventional suite (third study). The fourth study describes the transfer of open vascular surgical skills after proficiency-based bench model simulation training in SFJ dissection to the operating room (OR). Simulation-trained trainees scored higher than the controls on the procedural checklist developed (86.80 ± 5.36 vs. 67.60 ± 6.02 P = 0.001) and a global rating scale (37.20 ± 4.09 vs. 24.40 ± 5.32 P = 0.003) when performing SFA angioplasty on patients. Similarly, bench model simulation-trained trainees scored higher than the controls on procedural (30.33 ± 2.07 vs. 18 ± 2.19 P < 0.001) and global (28.33 ± 1.86 vs. 18.50 ± 4.04 P < 0.001) rating scales when performing SFJ dissection on patients. Basic surgical skills acquired using proficiency-based simulation training in SFA angioplasty and SFJ dissection do translate to real world performance. Structured proficiency-based simulation training in SFA angioplasty and SFJ dissection should be incorporated into surgical training programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Microbiology→Same topicSurgical Simulation and Training→French-language works237,207→