MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2582604264

AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF BONE TOOL MANUFACTURE AND USE: THE CASE OF THE ST. LAWRENCE IROQUOIANS

2016· article· es· W2582604264 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christian Gates St-Pierre, Clare St-Germain, Michelle Courtemanche, Claude Chapdelaine, Matthew J. Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos del Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano – Series Especiales · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeologyZooarchaeologyArchaeological scienceExcavationLithic technologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The McDonald, Droulers and Mailhot-Curran sites are part of the St. Anicet cluster of St. Lawrence Iroquoian villages, located in southern Quebec. After many years of archaeological excavations, the three sites have yielded large quantities of faunal remains, including numerous bone tools and manufacturing debris. The assemblages are currently being analysed as part of a new research project aiming at a better understanding of the exploitation of the faunal resources by the St. Lawrence Iroquoians. To attain this goal, an integrative approach was developed, combining the insights provided by a series of methods and techniques developed in the field of archaeological sciences (archaeometry), namely zooarchaeological, technological, functional (microwear), and biomolecular analyses. This paper presents the first results of these analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0120.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos del Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano – Series EspecialesSame topicForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207