MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2582640782

Ecology and Diversity of Wild Bees and Wasps in An Urban Landscape

2015· dissertation· en· W2582640782 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Scott MacIvor

Bibliographic record

VenueYorkSpace (York University) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcologyDiversity (politics)GeographyBiologyAnthropologySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bees are a diverse group of essential pollinators and useful for studying the impacts of urban environmental change on local biodiversity. A subset of solitary bee species widespread in cities the cavity-nesters nest in plant stems and bored holes in wood and readily use human-made nest boxes comprised of these materials or similar ones. Many solitary wasps that predate on abundant and pest arthropod species also use these nest boxes. Nest boxes provide information on diversity, parasitism, and a plethora of other data on cavity-nesting bees and wasps. The main objective was to detect patterns in cavity-nesting bee and wasp diversity using nest boxes and determine the urban factors that impact their populations. A primary goal was to connect urban gardening, land use planning, and policy more directly with bee populations. \n\tNest boxes were set up at 200 home gardens, community gardens, urban parks, and green roofs and each monitored by a member of a large network of citizen scientists. Nest boxes were set out in April and retrieved in October over three years (2011-2013). From October to March, bee, wasp, and parasite larvae were removed, then reared and identified to species. From over 27,000 records, 84 species of bees, wasps, and parasites were identified from three years including new records for the Toronto region. More native species were recorded than exotic ones, however the most abundant colonizers were exotic [Megachile rotundata Fabricius, Osmia caerulescens (Linnaeus)] and half of the colonizers were wasps. The type of urban green space surveyed and increasing habitat availability index (HAI), which included high resolution mapping of seven different land use types within 200m of the nest box, were important for increasing colonization. Diversity and abundance in nest boxes and in particularly that of bees was positively influenced by the luxury effect, while wasps and parasites responded negatively to increasing human population density. Nest boxes are useful tools for study of populations of cavity-nesting bees and wasps and can become catalysts for conversation regarding bee populations, diversity, and declines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYorkSpace (York University)Same topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207