A Mobile Social Realm: Labour, Sovereignty, and Subjecthood in Disabled Theater/Affordance Creations of Disability Performance: Limits of a Disabled Theater
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To be read alongside Arseli Dokumaci’s contribution to this issue, Katherine Zien’s article treats questions of ethics, affect, labor, and autonomy in Disabled Theater (DT), a performance created by Swiss performing company Theatre HORA and French choreographer Jérôme Bel. DT evinces traits of the artistic production of both contributors, yet HORA has made the piece its own by touring it around the world, for over 100 performances since its premiere in 2012. For better or worse, DT has become a signature piece for HORA and, in Zien’s terms, a “mobile social realm” offering a space where members of HORA can experiment with new ways of living and working together. The ethical and social dimensions of DT – and company members’ responses to them – have conditioned HORA’s expanded investigation of aesthetic and political control and collaboration that performance scholar Yvonne Schmidt examines in later productions. In addition to providing room for political and aesthetic exploration, DT’s mobile social realm can impact the communities in which it is performed. While this effect may not always be feasible in a festival setting, conditions at Concordia University in Montreal, Quebec, Canada were such that when HORA performed there on March 30-31, 2015, questions of disability, autonomy, and access to the city rose forcefully to the fore. Reflecting on her feelings of productive discomfort around the 2015 performance, Zien seeks a response to DT’s fractured reception in a melange of concrete poetry and prose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.074 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.023 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.021 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".