MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583115110 · doi:10.1002/jmor.20641

Organization of glomerular territories in the olfactory bulb of post-embryonic wild chinook salmon<i>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</i>

2017· article· en· W2583115110 on OpenAlexaff
Cory Ochs, Tina E. Suntres, Alexandra Zygowska, Trevor E. Pitcher, Barbara S. Zielinski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Morphology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyOncorhynchusOlfactory bulbImprinting (psychology)NeuropilOlfactory systemCalretininYolk sacOlfactionSensory systemAnatomyGlomerulusChinook windOdorZoologyNeuroscienceCentral nervous systemEmbryoFisheryEndocrinologyKidneyFish <Actinopterygii>Immunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The post-embryonic odor imprinting paradigm suggests Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) acquire memory to stream-specific amino acid olfactory odors prior to emergence as fry. Because effects of olfactory experience on development can be examined by mapping olfactory sensory neurons extending into distinct territories of glomerular neuropil in the olfactory bulb, glomerular patterning from early yolk-sac larva to fry was documented in wild salmonids, a temporal scale not yet thoroughly explored. Labeling olfactory sensory neurons with anti-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (anti-KLH) revealed seven spatially conserved glomerular territories visible at hatch and well established by the late yolk-sac larva developmental stage. Because of the responsiveness of microvillous olfactory sensory neurons to amino acids, corresponding glomeruli in the lateral bulbar region were mapped using anti-calretinin. The dorsolateral territory, distinct glomeruli of the lateral glomerular territory and the ventromedial glomeruli were immunoreactive to both KLH and calretinin. This study offers a morphological description of glomerular patterning in post-embryonic stages in wild Chinook salmon, a temporal window previously shown to be significant for olfactory imprinting. J. Morphol. 278:464-474, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of MorphologySame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207