MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583115856 · doi:10.1109/icecs.2016.7841173

Ultra low-power MEMS based radios for the IoT

2016· article· en· W2583115856 on OpenAlexaff
Raghavasimhan Thirunarayanan, Aravind Heragu, David Ruffieux, Christian Enz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsSemtech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorPhase noiseMicroelectromechanical systemsPhase-locked loopElectrical engineeringComputer scienceFrequency synthesizerElectronic engineeringEnergy (signal processing)Power (physics)Filter (signal processing)Q factorNoise (video)Crystal oscillatorMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The start-up phase of the radios is responsible for the major energy drain in duty cycled Internet of Things (IoT) nodes. The main source of this energy drain is the long start-up of the loop based frequency synthesizer; especially the crystal oscillator (XO) frequency reference. In order to greatly reduce this energy drain, this paper presents radios based on micromachined Bulk Acoustic Wave (BAW) resonators that have the capability to start in few μs as opposed to ≈ 1 ms start-up of the traditional XO. In addition, these resonators also have a high Quality factor (Q). This results in the oscillators employing these resonators having excellent phase noise, thereby aiding the development of loop-free frequency synthesizers. The high-Q has also been leveraged to make a very good high frequency filter that has been employed in the sub-sampling receiver presented in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcoustic Wave Resonator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207