Power-Aware Wireless Virtualized Resource Allocation with D2D Communication Underlaying LTE Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To meet the increasing mobile data services demand, several solutions have been proposed such as wireless resource virtualization and device-to-device (D2D) communication. Virtualization allows for more efficient utilization of the spectrum, reduces expenditures, and can support higher peak rates. D2D communication can achieve higher data rates due to the proximity of devices while controlling the interference it causes to cellular communication. However, the increase in data rate multimedia demand has led to an increase in global energy consumption. Thus, it is crucial to employ more energy-aware schemes as this would provide both environmental and financial gains for service providers. In this paper, we extend our work in [1] by formulating the problem of power-aware wireless resource virtualization with D2D communication underlaying the LTE network. Since the problem is a mixed integer non-linear programming problem (MINLP), it is divided into four smaller linear programs, each of which is solved to optimality. Two lower complexity heuristic algorithms to solve the power allocation problems are introduced. Results show significant savings at both eNodeB and D2D devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".