MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

ARNT Mediates Chemotherapy Resistance by Modulating the Response to Oxidative Stress in AML Cells.

2009· article· en· W2583180477 on OpenAlexaff
Richard A. Wells, Chunhong Gu, Joelle dela Paz

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocatorApoptosisCancer researchHaematopoiesisEtoposideBiologyChemistryTranscription factorCell biologyInternal medicineStem cellMedicineChemotherapyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2737 Poster Board II-713 Background Although patients with acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML) typically respond well to initial therapy, with over 75% of patients achieving complete remission, in the great majority the disease ultimately relapses. This is thought to be due to the inherent resistance of leukaemia stem cells to the effects of chemotherapy. While some mechanisms of chemoresistance, e.g. TP53 mutation and upregulation of P-glycoprotein expression, have been well characterized, this phenomenon remains incompletely understood and is a significant barrier to improving patient outcomes. Methods and results The thiazolidindione drug troglitazone (TG) induces apoptosis in AML cells via generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), but the degree of sensitivity to TG is highly heterogeneous among AML cell lines. We studied expression of the transcription factor ARNT (aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator) in TG-sensitive and TG-resistant AML cell lines following TG treatment. In HL-60 cells, which are highly sensitive to induction of apoptosis by TG, ARNT mRNA levels remained constant following TG treatment and ARNT protein levels markedly decreased, while in U937 cells, which are TG resistant, ARNT mRNA levels increased and ARNT protein levels remained constant. We then tested the effect of exogenous expression of ARNT on the sensitivity of HL-60 cells to TG-induced apoptosis. HL-60 cells transduced with a retrovirus expressing ARNT became TG-resistant. Exogenous expression of ARNT also conferred resistance to induction of apoptosis by hydrogen peroxide, daunorubicin and etoposide. The cellular response to oxidative stress is governed by intracellular signaling pathways and through a transcriptional response through which expression of antioxidant genes is coordinated. HL-60 cells expressing ARNT had striking constitutive activation of AKT signaling, and treatment of these cells with a specific inhibitor of AKT signaling reversed their resistance to TG-induced apoptosis. The activation of AKT signaling by ARNT appears to be mediated by downregulation of expression of PP2A and alpha4, two key negative regulators of AKT phosphorylation. In addition, ARNT-transduced HL-60 cells showed increased expression of Nrf2, a key transcriptional regulator of the antioxidant response, and its target genes SOD2 and CAT. Conclusions The response to oxidative stress is heterogeneous in AML cells lines, and varies with expression of ARNT. ARNT activates expression of Nrf2, which stimulates expression of antioxidant genes resulting in an augmented adaptive response to ROS. Unexpectedly, ARNT also activates AKT signaling by repressing expression of the regulatory phosphatases PP2A and alpha4. These activities of ARNT result in increased resistance to the induction of apoptosis by TG, hydrogen peroxide, and chemotherapy. ARNT may play an important role in chemoresistance in and may be useful as a predictive or prognostic biomarker. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→