MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583221790

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF TWO-PHASE BUBBLY FLOW PRESSURE DROP ACROSS A HORIZONTAL PIPE CONTAINING 90° BENDS

2016· article· en· W2583221790 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCNL Nuclear Review · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Mixing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPressure dropTurbulenceMechanicsPipe flowTwo-phase flowMaterials scienceDrop (telecommunication)Prandtl numberBubbleFlow (mathematics)GeologyHeat transferPhysicsEngineeringMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two-phase gas–liquid pressure drop was experimentally investigated in a 9 m long, 50.8 mm internal diameter, horizontal test section containing 2 closely spaced 90° bends. Bubble and dispersed flow regimes were achieved at superficial liquid and gas velocities that were varied from 3.50 to 5.42 m/s, and 0.10 to 1.25 m/s, respectively. Single-phase and two-phase flow pressure drop tests were performed to evaluate major and minor loss coefficients. The Lockhart–Martinelli parameters were modified through the addition of a minor loss term, and results were compared with Chisholm’s turbulent-turbulent gas–liquid pressure drop model. Three different pipe configurations were evaluated. They consisted of a single straight pipe, a straight pipe with a single 90° bend, and straight pipe with two 90° bends. Both Blasius’ and Prandtl’s smooth pipe models were evaluated to predict the two-phase frictional losses, while single- and two-phase minor loss coefficients were tested with varying degrees of effectiveness. Ov...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it