MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Biotin-Labeled RBC Survival in Thalassemia and Impact of Treatment.

2004· article· en· W2583226182 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvia T. Singer, Nancy E. Olivieri, Nancy Sweeters, Carmen Rodwell, Christina Oliver, Elliott Vichinsky, Frans A. Kuypers

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiotinylationFetal hemoglobinBiotinHemoglobinThalassemiaHemolysisMedicineRed blood cellEx vivoAndrologyImmunologyGastroenterologyInternal medicineChemistryMolecular biologyBiologyBiochemistryFetusIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Determination of red blood cell (RBC) survival in the peripheral blood, to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological agents that augment fetal hemoglobin (HbF) and total hemoglobin (Hb) in patients with beta-thalassemia, has not been implemented. We report the use of biotin labeling, a nonisotopic, safe and effective method to determine the erythrocyte lifespan, proven to be equivalent to 51Cr. We studied RBC survival in 9 Hemoglobin E-β-thalassemia (ET) patients, 4 thalassemia intermedia (TI) patients and compared RBC survival to normal control. Repeat measures were performed in 3 ET patients while on hydroxyurea (HU) treatment at 15–19 mg/Kg/day. RBC from 30 ml blood were ex-vivo biotinylated under sterile conditions using EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-Biotin (Pierce), and re-infused to the patient as described before (Franco et al,1998). At set time points, the number of biotinylated cells was determined in small blood samples by flowcytometry using fluorescently labeled strepavidin. All patients tolerated the procedure well without an indication of re-infusion induced infection or anti-biotin antibody related hemolysis. The presence of biotinylated cells in the circulation was followed until only 0.05-0.08% biotinylated cells could be detected. The data were mathematically fitted to 100–100*[1-(1/T)*t]exp(-kt), where t is the time point, T is the extinction time, and k the exponential rate of RBC removal. The control data showed a linear removal rate (k=0), and a T of 100 days (R=0.95), consistent with a normal red cell life span. In the 9 ET and 4 TI patients, a faster disappearance of biotinylated cells was noted, and the number of surviving (biotinylated) cells in the population followed an exponential pattern, consistent with random removal (k=0.033, R= 0.97). Mean survival was 43±11 and 36±15 days, respectively. The 3 patients who received 10–12 months of HU treatment had a mean 0.8 gr/dL increase in their Hb and 20% increase in HbF. However, no difference was found in the RBC survival curves of these patients (k=0.034, R= 0.97), as compared to the non treated patients. One patient who was treated with HU and Erythropoietin (500u/Kg x3/wk) and had a 1.6 gr/dL increase in hemoglobin and RBC survival analysis showed the biotinylated cells to follow a similar survival curve. While these results cannot exclude a longer survival in selected cells, specifically those containing higher HbF, the overall effect of HU treatment has not proven to prolong the lifespan of labeled thalassemia erythrocytes. These results indicate that biotin label provides RBC survival characteristics in thalassemia patients. The method has advantages over 51Cr, including lack of radioactivity, avoiding labeling elution, low expense and recovery of labeled cells after prolonged time in the circulation. Moreover, the method is a valuable tool to measure effect of various treatments on the survival characteristics of the thalassemia erythrocytes. Preliminary findings indicate that despite the effect of HU on an increase in HbF and a mild to moderate increase in total Hb, the overall thalassemic erythrocyte lifespan has not increased, suggesting other mechanisms for these results including erythroid expansion, improved effective erythropoiesis and cell selection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207