MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583369153 · doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2016.12.973

Proposal of a new adverse event classification system by the SIR Standards of Practice Committee

2017· article· en· W2583369153 on OpenAlexaff
Omid Khalilzadeh, Mark O. Baerlocher, D KATSARELIS, Paul B. Shyn, A. Michael Devane, Christopher S. Morris, Alexander Cohen, Bairbre Connolly, Mehran Midia, R.H. Thornton, Kathleen A. Gross, Drew M. Caplin, Gunjan Aeron, Sanjay Misra, Nilam Patel, T. Gregory Walker, G Martinez-Salazar, James E. Silberzweig, Boris Nikolic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Safety Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenRoyal Victoria Regional Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEvent (particle physics)Adverse effectFamily medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.142
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.167
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1420.167
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.005
Bibliometrics0.0120.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0080.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vascular and Interventional RadiologySame topicRisk and Safety AnalysisFrench-language works237,207