MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583413203 · doi:10.3130/aija.65.171_6

ON THE DETERIORATION OF THE HISTORICAL 'EUROPEAN QUARTER' IN ALEXANDRIA, EGYPT

2000· article· en· W2583413203 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ali Essam El-Shazly

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ) · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Plan (archaeology)Five year planBusinessGeographyArchaeologyChina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the present deterioration in 1997 of the historical 'European Quarter' in Alexandria, in comparison with the 'Insurance Plan' in 1905. The European Quarter is analyzed according to the criteria of 1) urban structure, 2) building ownership and function, and 3) insurance and taxation policies. The street pattern and buildings in 1905 were defined by the regulation of 1834 and the bylaws in 1891, as well as kept maintained by the insurance against a various items of building. After the nationalization in 1952, the quarter has been forced to the deterioration by the 'Rent Control' policy and the change of the bylaws related to urban planning and building.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)Same topicArchaeology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207