Littératie, littératie médiatique multimodale et paradigme multimodal : approches de l’éducation pour le 21e siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La massification et la multiplication des modes et des médias dans la société contemporaine transforment le contexte communicationnel. Le développement et l’accessibilité croissants et des technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) contribuent fortement à ces changements. Leur omniprésence dans la vie des individus a des implications en éducation, car former les citoyens actifs et critiques du 21e siècle nécessite de considérer la nouvelle forme de littératie émergeant de ce contexte : la littératie médiatique et multimodale (LMM). Pour y parvenir, il importe de comprendre ses origines, ses composantes et le fonctionnement de ces diverses composantes entre elles dans un contexte éducatif. Il vise ainsi à 1) situer la LMM dans l'évolution du concept de la littératie en éducation, 2) présenter une synthèse des éléments de LMM, 3) présenter une synthèse du paradigme multimodal et 4) aborder la complexité des interactions médiatiques et multimodales en contexte éducatif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".