MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583561389 · doi:10.1016/s0167-8140(15)41173-9

EP-1181: SBRT in oligometastatic/oligorecurrent NSCLC cancer patients: a new therapeutic approach

2015· article· en· W2583561389 on OpenAlexaff
Stefano Bracci, Linda Agolli, Luca Nicosia, Teresa Falco, Maurizio Valeriani, Giuseppe Minniti, Vitaliana De Sanctis, Mattia Falchetto Osti, R. Maurizi Enrici

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiotherapy and Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose/Objective: Pulmonary emphysema (PE) is a non functional lung region due to destruction of the gasexchanging tissues.This information is never integrated into the radiotherapy (RT) plan for lung cancer (LC).With Myrian © software dedicated to radiology, an automatic delineation of PE can be processed and transferred to the treatment planning system (TPS).The main goal of this study was to evaluate the possibility to transfer and integrate the PE information into a radiotherapy plan, and calculate the volume of the healthy lung. Materials and Methods:We analyzed patients with LC and PE treated with RT excluding stereotactic treatments.All patients had a diagnostic CT before RT.The PE structure was delineated with Myrian © on the diagnostic CT and then transferred to the TPS.To permit a good correlation a deformable registration was performed between the diagnostic CT and the CT dedicated to RT with Velocity AI © .We created the healthy lung (HL) structure corresponding to the lung excluding the planning treatment volume (PTV) and the PE.We compared for each patient the lung-PTV volume to the HL volume.Results: Nine patients were included in our study, 2 women and 7 men.They all had intensity modulated RT.Mean total dose was 52.7 Gy (range, 36 -66).The delay between the diagnostic and the planning CT varied between 3 to 111 days.The mean PE volume was 322 cm 3 (range, 12 -1394), and the mean variation between the lung-PTV volume and HL volume was 7.25% (range, 0.33% -26.22%).Two patients had major volume variations respectively 14.8% and 26.22% corresponding to a PE volume of 668 and 1394 cm 3 . Conclusions:The transfer of the PE structure previously delineated with Myrian © to the TPS is readily feasible.Moreover, the difference between the HL and the lung-PTV structures can be considerable.It will be of interest to analyze the impact of integrating PE information to the radiotherapy plan to spare more HL for patients with PE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRadiotherapy and OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207