MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583626640

New York, Ontario and Western鉄道会社の複会計システム

2016· article· ja· W2583626640 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
光紀 春日部

Bibliographic record

VenueHokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (Hokkaido University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本稿は,アメリカ鉄道会社における複会計システムの事例としてNew York, Ontario and Western Railway Company(以下NYOW鉄道会社と略称)を俎上にのせ,同社の年次報告書を分析・検討している。同社の複会計システムは,1868年鉄道規制法の第1スケジュールで要求された15種類の計算書にほぼ対応しており,その勘定体系を踏襲するものであった。ただし一般貸借対照表は,鉄道規制法と異なり通常の形式で作成されており,そこには資本勘定残高が振り替えられていないことから,複会計の形式を踏襲しながらも資本勘定は勘定体系から独立したものであった。実際に資本勘定は,1903年からは非開示となっている。\n複会計システムを採用した背景には,ロンドンやアムステルダムを中心とした外国人投資家の存在があった。1895年の年次報告書では,株式の半数以上が外国人に所有されているとしており,このような状況が会計報告書の採用に影響を与えた。しかしながら1905年には,NYOW鉄道会社の外国人株主は12%まで低下している。資本勘定が非開示となる時期と併せて考えると,外国人株主の減少とともに報告対象の主眼がイギリス人株主からアメリカ人株主に転換し,複会計から通常の勘定体系への移行が始まったと考えられる。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (Hokkaido University)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207