MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583716252

Applying the Ontario Lakeshore Capacity Model to Lakes in Nova Scotia

2009· book· en· W2583716252 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christina Soliman

Bibliographic record

VenueVDM Verlag Dr. Müller eBooks · 2009
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrophic levelEnvironmental scienceWater qualityHypolimnionNova scotiaGeographyEnvironmental resource managementEcologyEutrophicationNutrient
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ontario Lakeshore Capacity model (LCM) has been widely and successfully used for over 30 years. Water quality models such as the LCM are useful and important tools that can provide invaluable insights into past and future lake trophic status. This information can then be used to maintain water quality during future development, and to set realistic remediation goals. The LCM is simple and robust, making it an ideal candidate to study and test applications in different geographical regions. In this book, total phosphorus and volume-weighted hypolimnetic dissolved oxygen concentrations were modelled to identify changes in lake trophic status, shoreline development capacities and coldwater fish habitat. Preliminary sensitivity and uncertainty analyses were also conducted and outlined, so that proper result interpretation is possible; one of the most important aspects of scientific modelling. Through the research described in this book, the reader will not only understand the purpose and value of modelling, but should be able to comprehend the inner-workings of the LCM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVDM Verlag Dr. Müller eBooksSame topicWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentFrench-language works237,207