Crowdsourced Live Streaming over Aggregated Edge Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed a dramatic increase of user-generated video services. In such user-generated video services, crowdsourced live streaming (e.g., Periscope, Twitch) has significantly challenged today's content delivery infrastructure: today's edge networks (e.g., 4G, Wi-Fi) have limited uplink capacity support, making high-bitrate live streaming over such links fundamentally impossible. In this paper, we propose to let broadcasters (i.e., users who generate the video) upload crowdsourced video streams using aggregated network resources from multiple edge networks. There are several challenges in the proposal: First, how to design a framework that aggregates bandwidth from multiple edge networks? Second, how to make this framework transparent to today's crowdsourced live stream- ing services? Third, how to maximize the streaming quality for the whole system? We design a multi-objective and deployable bandwidth aggregation system BASS to address these challenges: (1) We propose an aggregation framework transparent to today's crowdsourced live streaming services, using an edge proxy box and aggregation cloud paradigm; (2) We dynamically allocate geo- distributed cloud aggregation servers to enable MPTCP (i.e., multi- path TCP), according to location and network characteristics of both broadcasters and the original streaming servers; (3) We maximize the overall performance gain for the whole system, by matching streams with the best aggregation paths.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".