FRAMEWORK FOR REFORMING BUILDING REGULATORY SYSTEMS WITH "PERFORMANCE-BASED" APPROACH : A comparative study of English, New Zealand, Australian and Canadian systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper discusses applicable framework to organize regulation systems in which the "Performance-based" approach is applied. Through comparing analysis among examples of four countries, the following frameworks are identified and regarded to be also useful for international harmonization ; The essential feature of "Performance-based" regulation systems could be understood as the structure for organizing "Objectives", "Requirements" and "Solutions" independently and establish relationships among them. "Requirements" may consist of "Function" and "Performance", though current state-of-the-arts of related technology may restrict the use of "Performance" to specify "Requirement". However, "Performance standards" may use reasonably as "Deemed-to-satisfy Solutions".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it