MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583751273 · doi:10.1016/j.hrcr.2015.07.009

Combination of a leadless pacemaker and subcutaneous defibrillator: First in-human report

2015· article· en· W2583751273 on OpenAlexaff
Blandine Mondésert, Marc Dubuc, Paul Khairy, Peter G. Guerra, Gilbert Gosselin, Bernard Thibault

Bibliographic record

VenueHeartRhythm Case Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteUniversité de Montréal
FundersBoston Scientific Corporation
KeywordsMedicineIntracardiac injectionCardiologyTransvenous pacingInternal medicineImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorCardiac pacing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although transvenous pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) have long been the standard of care, they are not without significant drawbacks. In recent years, major advances have been achieved in leadless pacemaker technology1 and entirely subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) systems2 that obviate intracardiac leads and hence carry the potential to reduce associated complications. Unlike standard ICDs, the S-ICD is devoid of antibradycardia pacing capabilities. Nevertheless, certain patients, such as those lacking vascular access for transvenous lead insertion, may benefit from leadless devices with both pacing and ICD functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeartRhythm Case ReportsSame topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesFrench-language works237,207