MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583766854 · doi:10.31581/jbs-27.1-4.6(2013)

Review of The Maxwells of Montreal by Bahiyyih Nakhjavani

2013· article· en· W2583766854 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kathryin Jewett Hogenson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Bahá’í Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysics and Sensor Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When only seventeen years old, Mary Maxwell made an extraordinary promise to her mother.Unprompted, she volunteered to write her mother's biography (Nakhjavani, vol.I, viii, 23).This was not simply the pledge of a daughter who intensely adored her mother, nor the naïve vow of an aspiring writer, for Mary had recognized at that early age that her mother, Mary "May" Ellis Bolles Maxwell, had already won a prominent place in Bahá'í history, not only as one of the first members of the Cause in the West but also as midwife to the birth of the Faith in Europe and as its tireless proponent in Canada and the United States during its first decades in those countries.Young Mary's assessment of her mother's merit was affirmed years later when Shoghi Effendi designated May a "martyr" in his cable at the time of her passing in 1940: "to sacred tie her signal services had forged priceless honour martyrs death now added double crown deservedly won" (qtd. in vol.II, 367) .A decade after the promise was given, Mary became Madame Rabbani, better known to Bahá'ís as Amatu'l-Bahá Rúhíyyih Khánum, wife of and helpmate to Shoghi Effendi, Guardian of the Bahá'í Faith-the "sacred tie" referred to in the above cable.From that point forward, her public and administrative duties consumed her attention to the end of her life, so the girlhood promise remained unfulfilled-although it was seldom far from her thoughts.113 Ultimately, she was never able to complete the biography, though she chose its title: "The Maxwells of Montreal," and made a start by drafting a beginning shortly after her mother's passing; years later she penned an introduction.Those two works constitute the opening pages of The Maxwells of Montreal, 1 She also filled leather-bound notebooks with memories, notes, and lists of topics to include in the work.Over time, the realization came to her that, because she was part of a close-knit family, any biography of her mother must also be a biography of her father, the celebrated architect and Hand of the Cause of God, William Sutherland Maxwell, as well as a recounting of her own childhood and youth.Her research expanded as she sorted through her parents' papers, choosing letters, notes, and journal entries.Years passed, and as she entered her twilight years, Rúhíyyih Khánum made one last attempt to fulfill the commitment of her youth by tracing family papers held by relatives (vol.I, viii, x).Finally, after her passing in 2000, her younger, devoted friend and travel companion, Violette Nakhjavani, with the aid of a team of others who were devoted to her memory, took up the unfinished task (vol.I, xi).The two volumes: The Maxwells of Montreal: Early Years 1870-1922, Vol.I and The Maxwells of Montreal: Middle Years 1923-1937, Late Years 1937-1952, Vol.II, are the realization of the promise made by young Mary Maxwell more than eighty years earlier.Violette Nakhjavani did not conceive of the work as a proper biography but as a selected collection of correspondence from the Maxwell papers.She envisioned herself more as editor than author and allowed May, Sutherland, and Mary to tell their stories in their own authentic voices (vol.I, xii).Her narrative guides the reader as well as provides background.Rúhíyyih Khánum had initiated the process of researching, sorting, typing, and cataloging her family papers with the assistance of her long-time, devoted secretary, Miss Nell Golden.Despite that groundwork, Mrs. Nakhjavani faced a daunting task.The Maxwell archives

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Bahá’í StudiesSame topicGeophysics and Sensor TechnologyFrench-language works237,207