MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583847445 · doi:10.1115/1.4035879

A High Performance Voice Coil Actuator for Optomechatronic Applications

2017· article· en· W2583847445 on OpenAlexafffund
Dion Hicks, Taufiq Rahman, Nicholas Krouglicof

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanisms and Robotics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward IslandMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyResearch and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador
KeywordsActuatorKinematicsElectromagnetic coilVoice coilComputer scienceLinear actuatorDegrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Orientation (vector space)ElectronicsPrinted circuit boardPlanarControl theory (sociology)EngineeringMechanical engineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Voice coil actuators (VCAs) are simple electro-mechanical devices, which are capable of generating linear motion in response to an electrical input. The generic cylindrical design of commercially available actuators imposes a large variety of limitations on the end user. The most prominent is the requirement to design and fit extra components to the actuator in order to increase functionality. To solve this issue, a novel voice coil actuator was created, which reconfigures the standard cylindrical design with one of a rectangular structure. The novel actuator incorporates planar magnets in a modified Halbach array configuration to ensure compactness and an exceptionally intense, uniform magnetic field. The moving coil is substituted with a printed circuit board (PCB) encompassing numerous current conducting traces. The board contains a miniature linear rail and bearing system, unified drive electronics, and highly adaptive position feedback circuitry resulting in a compact, highly dynamic and accurate device. In pursuit of optomechatronic applications, two distinct parallel kinematic mechanisms (PKMs) were developed to utilize the high dynamics and accuracy of the novel actuator. These devices were configured to function in only rotational degrees-of-freedom (DOF) and because of their underlying kinematic structures can be referred to as parallel orientation manipulators (POMs). In particular, two structures were defined, 2-PSS/U and 3-PSS/S, in order to constrain their payloads to two and three degrees of rotational freedom, respectively. The resultant manipulators are highly dynamic, precise and fulfill size, weight, and power requirements for many applications such as sense and avoidance and visual tracking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mechanisms and RoboticsSame topicSoft Robotics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207