MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2584100012

The Chisasibi Child Language Acquisition Study (CCLAS): A Progress Report

2007· article· en· W2584100012 on OpenAlex
Carrie Dyck, Julie Brittain, Yvan Rose, Marguerite MacKenzie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgonquian Papers - Archive · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLanguage Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLanguage acquisitionLongitudinal studyPsychologyMathematics educationMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Chisasibi Child Language Acquisition Study (CCLAS) is a longitudinal naturalistic first language (LI) acquisition study of Northern East Cree-speaking children located in the community of Chisasibi, Quebec (on the east coast of James Bay).1 The study focusses on production only. Our aim in this paper is to provide an overview of the progress we have made in this study, which has n o w entered its third year, and to provide some sense of the challenges encountered and the solutions w e came up with in response. W e describe the procedures developed, in many cases through trial and error, in order to create an efficient way to conduct a longitudinal acquisition study, where researchers are not actually on site for much of the time. Our aim in this paper is to provide a how-to guide for other researchers or communities wishing to undertake comparable research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it