MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2584196694 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v17i1.441

Effect of Dye on the Performance of Nitrogen Doped TiO2 Solar Cell Prepared via Ammonia Treated Liquid Phase Deposition Technique

2014· article· en· W2584196694 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Y. A. Rahman, Akrajas Ali Umar, Siti Khatijah Md Saad, Muhamad Mat Salleh, A. Ishaq

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDye-sensitized solar cellMaterials scienceSolar cellElectrolyteDopantShort circuitOpen-circuit voltageEnergy conversion efficiencySpin coatingChemical engineeringAbsorption (acoustics)DopingAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrodeThin filmOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyChemistryVoltageChromatographyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports the utilization of nitrogen-doped TiO2 nanoparticle in dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC). The TiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized on ITO substrate via a simple technique, namely, liquid phase deposition (LPD). 7.5% nitrogen from NH3 dopant source was doped into the TiO2 samples by spin coating technique. The nitrogen doped TiO2 samples were then utilized as photovoltaic materials in a photoelectrochemical cell of ITO/TiO2/electrolyte/platinum sensitized with N-719, N-3 and Z-907 dyes, respectively. It was found that the photovoltaic parameters such as short-circuit current density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), fill factor (FF) and power conversion efficiency (η) are influenced by the organic dyes. The cell sensitized with N-719 dye demonstrated the highest photovoltaic parameters. These results are supported with the UV-Vis analysis, showing that the N-719 dye possessed the broadest window absorption and the highest absorption peak in visible region of light spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsFrench-language works237,207